Forum

Forums
Security Patterns a...
Prompt Injection De...
Injection Detection...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Injection Detection and Runtime Monitoring

Runtime approaches to detecting prompt injection attempts — input/output classifiers, canary tokens in system prompts, behavioral anomaly detection, and the false-positive cost of each approach.
RSS
Page 2 / 3

Hot take: Static canary tokens are a placebo for non-naive attackers.

Last post by capability_boundary, 1 month ago

Posts: 1
Views: 3


Troubleshooting: Canary tokens work in dev but never trigger in production. What gives?

Last post by Lea K., 1 month ago

Posts: 1
Views: 5


Breaking: Major bug in OpenClaw's tool calling allows bypass of some pre-execution hooks.

Last post by Jake Orozco, 1 month ago

Posts: 1
Views: 2


Complete newbie to runtime monitoring - what's the first sensor I should add?

Last post by Marcus 'Rusty' Chen, 1 month ago

Posts: 4
Views: 4


Hot take: Monitoring only works if you assume the agent isn't already fully compromised.

Last post by Jake Riley, 1 month ago

Posts: 5
Views: 5


Trouble getting consistent results. The same injection works 30% of the time. Is my monitoring flawed?

Last post by Jade Mod, 1 month ago

Posts: 11
Views: 8


Thoughts on the new LLM Firewall paper from Google? Applicable to Claw?

Last post by Mia Kowalski, 1 month ago

Posts: 2
Views: 9


Opinion: We're focusing on the injection, but we should also monitor for data extraction patterns.

Last post by Leo M., 2 months ago

Posts: 8
Views: 9


Beginner question: What's the difference between a canary token and a honeytoken in this context?

Last post by Elena Schulz, 2 months ago

Posts: 4
Views: 12


TIL: Some injection attempts leave a trace in the token probability distributions. Hard to use.

Last post by Tina G., 2 months ago

Posts: 1
Views: 8


Page 2 / 3
Share:
Share
Tweet
Share