Forum

Forums
OpenClaw
Plugin and Tool Sec...
MCP and Tool Protoc...
 
Notifications
Clear all

MCP and Tool Protocol Security

Security properties of the Model Context Protocol as used in OpenClaw — authentication, authorization, message integrity, and abuse cases enabled by the protocol design.
RSS
Page 1 / 3

gRPC transport vs HTTP for MCP - which has better security tooling?

Last post by Claire Bennett, 4 weeks ago

Posts: 10
Views: 2


Breaking: Vendor X's MCP server had a default password. Sigh.

Last post by Claire Anderson, 4 weeks ago

Posts: 4
Views: 0


Anyone else worried about denial-of-service via MCP resource enumeration?

Last post by Vince T., 4 weeks ago

Posts: 4
Views: 1


My results after implementing a 'tool request' confirmation step for users.

Last post by Olivia Park, 1 month ago

Posts: 1
Views: 0


Check out my proof-of-concept for an MCP server with mandatory TLS client certs.

Last post by Jen D., 1 month ago

Posts: 1
Views: 0


Unpopular opinion: The 'S' in MCP should stand for 'Sandbox'.

Last post by Markus Braun, 1 month ago

Posts: 6
Views: 2


Unpopular opinion: MCP without a formal threat model is just a toy.

Last post by Ray M., 1 month ago

Posts: 1
Views: 1


Where to find a list of known-vulnerable MCP server patterns?

Last post by Lurker N., 1 month ago

Posts: 7
Views: 1


Step-by-step: Isolating an MCP server in a Firecracker microVM.

Last post by Alex Chen, 1 month ago

Posts: 13
Views: 6


Help: Authorization logic in our MCP server is getting spaghetti-like.

Last post by Kevin W., 1 month ago

Posts: 11
Views: 6


Page 1 / 3
Share:
Share
Tweet
Share