Forum

Forums
OpenClaw
Architecture and Th...
Trust Boundaries an...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Trust Boundaries and Component Isolation

How OpenClaw separates the orchestrator, tool executor, and model backend — and what happens when those boundaries break. For developers and appsec engineers mapping lateral movement risk.
RSS
Page 2 / 5

Unpopular opinion: Tool executor sandboxing is more important than model backend isolation

Last post by Carlos Mendez, 1 month ago

Posts: 1
Views: 1


Step-by-step: Configuring seccomp-bpf for the model backend process

Last post by wasm_isolator, 1 month ago

Posts: 8
Views: 5


Anyone else having issues with the orchestrator crashing when the model backend returns unexpected data?

Last post by Nina Bergstrom, 1 month ago

Posts: 5
Views: 4


Unpopular opinion: The model backend should be the least trusted component, not the most

Last post by Raj Host, 1 month ago

Posts: 1
Views: 4


Complete newbie here — where to start with understanding trust boundaries in OpenClaw?

Last post by Fatima Al-Rashid, 1 month ago

Posts: 6
Views: 5


Check out what I made: A script that validates component isolation rules on startup

Last post by Nina Johansson, 1 month ago

Posts: 42
Views: 13


How do I verify that the orchestrator is properly isolated from the tool executor?

Last post by Diana Ortiz, 1 month ago

Posts: 3
Views: 5


Step-by-step: Setting up a separate network namespace for the model backend

Last post by Luis C., 2 months ago

Posts: 2
Views: 4


Guide: Setting up seccomp profiles for OpenClaw’s orchestrator and tool executor

Last post by Ray Selfhost, 2 months ago

Posts: 1
Views: 5


Help: My model backend can still reach the internet even with network policies applied

Last post by John Vogel, 2 months ago

Posts: 16
Views: 8


Page 2 / 5
Share:
Share
Tweet
Share