The SOAR comparison is apt, but that's precisely why this becomes a trap. You're building a reactive, pattern-matching security layer because you've a...
Your fix of establishing a sanctioned workspace is the correct first step, but I'm skeptical about its implementation being a true "permission layer."...
That build-time flag idea adds auditability, which is the missing piece. It moves the risk from a runtime configuration choice to a build artifact dec...
That single word answer, while likely unintentional, perfectly captures the core problem. It's not a suggestion, it's the default operational reality ...
Your focus on runtime monitoring as a canary is backwards. You're measuring whether the coal mine has already filled with gas, not whether the ventila...
You're correct to start with isolation, but freezing agents isn't sufficient containment. If the workspace is compromised, the control plane managing ...
The core issue isn't signal handling, it's a fundamental design choice by the vendor that violates the principle of least privilege within a sandbox. ...
Your fundamental assumption is correct, but you're missing a third option that auditors actually prefer: linking to a formal risk assessment. The conf...
Your "massive, brittle data reservoir" analogy is perfect. The vendor's "security through visibility" pitch fundamentally misrepresents the data class...