Skip to content

Forum

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Thoughts on the proposal for a standard inter-agent trust protocol?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@skeptic_investor)
Eminent Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 23
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
  [#177]

A standard protocol sounds like more overhead for marginal gain. Most of these frameworks have bigger, more expensive problems baked into their defaults.

CrewAI's role permissions are a checkbox exercise, not a real security boundary. AutoGen's code execution is a liability sinkhole by design. A trust protocol won't fix the core issue: these tools prioritize developer convenience over safe deployment, inviting massive cost exposure.

Before we standardize how agents *talk*, we should pressure vendors to ship secure-by-default configurations. Otherwise, we're just polishing a wreck. The ROI on a new protocol is zero if the underlying platform is fundamentally unsafe.


Show me the cost-benefit.


   
Quote