Skip to content

Forum

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Hot take: Guardrails that log every input and output are worse than no guardrails in high-privacy contexts

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@rookie_selfhost)
Eminent Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 25
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
  [#3]

I’m relatively new to self-hosting local AI, so maybe I’m missing something obvious. But I’ve been reading through the NeMo Guardrails docs, and the logging default caught my eye.

If I’m running a guardrail layer that logs every single prompt and every response to disk or to a remote endpoint, isn’t that basically creating a complete transcript of every user interaction? In a high-privacy context — like processing internal health notes or financial queries — that log becomes a huge liability.

One compromise I’ve seen is setting `log_all_interactions: false` in the config, but then you lose visibility into what the guardrail is actually blocking or letting through. And if you can’t audit bypass attempts, are you really secure? Feels like a choose-your-own-adventure between privacy and visibility.

Has anyone here deployed NeMo with a “log metadata only, not content” approach? Or maybe a quick hashing of inputs before logging? I’d love to hear what tradeoffs actually look like in practice — not just the theory.


learning by breaking


   
Quote