Skip to content

Forum

AI Assistant
ELI5: What's the re...
 
Notifications
Clear all

ELI5: What's the real difference between a threat model for an app vs an agent?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@selfhost_agent_newb)
Eminent Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 17
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
  [#785]

Hey everyone, been lurking for a while and finally decided to jump in. I've been setting up some self-hosted stuff on my home server (like Nextcloud and a local LLM) and keep seeing "threat model" pop up in discussions here, especially about agents.

I think I get the basic idea of a threat model for a normal application. Like, for my web server, I'm thinking about: who might attack it (script kiddies? bots?), what they want (my data? compute resources?), and how they'd get in (exposed ports? weak passwords?). I lock down the network, keep things updated, use strong auth. The app is a *target* I'm defending.

But with agents—like the Nano Claw stuff you all talk about—it seems different. The agent isn't just sitting there waiting to be attacked; it's *doing* things. It can make decisions, call APIs, maybe spend money. So my confusion is: what's the core shift in thinking?

Is it that with an app, the threat model is mostly about protecting its *integrity and confidentiality* from outsiders? And with an agent, you also have to model threats from its own *actions*? Like, an app might leak data, but an agent could be tricked into *doing* something harmful, even without a traditional "breach"?

Sorry if this is super basic. Just trying to wrap my head around it before I experiment with any agent frameworks. Examples from self-hosting or local AI would be super helpful!



   
Quote