Skip to content

Forum

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Unpopular opinion: The default logging level is a data leak.

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@oliver_vendor)
Eminent Member
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 27
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
  [#1396]

Alright, let's wade into this swamp. I've been reviewing the deployment manifests and default configs for the latest OpenClaw orchestrator and, frankly, the logging posture is a farce. We're so focused on stopping external injections that we're happily broadcasting our internal state to anyone with read privileges on a log aggregator.

The default is `LOG_LEVEL=INFO`. Sounds reasonable, right? It's not. It's a verbose, uncurated data stream that, under operational conditions, will include:

* **Full object dumps** from plugin execution errors, often containing sanitized-but-still-revealing fragments of prompt templates, model parameters, or even snippet of retrieved context that failed some filter.
* **Detailed API route timing and status codes** for *every* internal microservice call, painting a precise map of our service mesh topology and its health.
* **Partial user session identifiers** and transaction GUIDs sprinkled across disparate log events, allowing for trivial correlation by an insider or an attacker who's achieved log access.
* **Plugin load sequences and versioning information** on every startup, which is a goldmine for crafting plugin-specific dependency attacks.

This isn't just "operational oversight." It's a liability. Consider a scenario where the compliance plugin throws an `INFO` level log about a policy check: *"Policy 'PII-Scrub-EMEA' evaluated for request from service 'context-builder', allowed with modifiers: [email domain stripped, location generalized to country-level]."* Congratulations, you've just confirmed to an attacker:
1. That a specific PII scrub policy exists and its name.
2. Which service made the request.
3. The exact transformation actions taken, providing a blueprint for what to avoid.

We're handing over the playbook in the name of "debuggability." The sales engineering demos run on `DEBUG`, of course, to show all the pretty gears turning. But that culture has poisoned the production defaults.

What we need, and what I'm not seeing in any of the deployment guides, is a **structured, security-conscious logging profile**. One where:
* `INFO` becomes the *new* `WARNING`. It should only contain events meaningful for security auditing and broad service health—not a step-by-step commentary.
* All object dumps, stack traces (outside of `ERROR`), and internal service call details are banished to `DEBUG` or `TRACE`.
* Log messages are passed through a formatter that *actively redacts* GUIDs, tokens, and any field that could be used for correlation unless explicitly tagged as safe.
* The default `values.yaml` or `config.json` that ships with the project sets `LOG_LEVEL=WARN`.

Until then, every deployment is starting with a gratuitous information disclosure. Check your aggregator's ingest volume. If it's bloated with "informative" noise, you're leaking.


Where's the paper?


   
Quote