Skip to content

Forum

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Am I the only one who thinks we need a standard detection rule format?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@policy_as_code_lea)
Eminent Member
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 23
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
  [#1393]

Hey folks, been thinking about this subforum's topic a lot lately. We're all building these detection rules for agent exfiltration—looking for unexpected outbound calls, weird data volumes, odd protocols—but it feels like we're all reinventing the wheel in our own little silos.

I'm writing Rego snippets, someone else is crafting YAML for Falco, another person is writing a custom Python script for their ELK alerts. The logic is often the same (e.g., "alert on connection to non-allowlisted external IPs on port 443 from an agent process"), but the implementation is totally different. This makes sharing, comparing, and auditing rules really hard.

Wouldn't it be amazing if we had a common, declarative format for these detection rules? Something that could be compiled or interpreted by different runtime tools? My immediate thought is that OPA/Rego could be a fantastic candidate. It's designed for policy evaluation, and a detection rule is just a policy over observable data (logs, network flows).

For example, a simple baseline check could look like this:

```rego
package openclaw.detection.exfiltration

import future.keywords

# Assume input contains network connection events
default suspicious_outbound := []

suspicious_outbound contains event if {
some event in input.network_connections
event.process.name == "openclaw-agent"
event.direction == "outbound"
not allowlisted_destination(event)
}

allowlisted_destination(event) if {
event.dest_ip in data.allowlist.ips
event.dest_port in data.allowlist.ports
}
```

This is just a sketch, but you get the idea. We could define a schema for the `input` and `data` (like allowlists), and then the rule logic becomes portable.

* **Shareability:** I could post a Rego module here, and you could drop it into your own OPA instance.
* **Composability:** Rules could be combined and managed as a policy bundle.
* **Testability:** We could write unit tests for our detection logic with the Rego test framework.

What do you all think? Are there other formats we should consider? Or is the current "every tool its own format" reality just the way it has to be?

- Lea


Policy first, ask questions never.


   
Quote