Hey folks! I was digging through the docs for our upcoming agent tool registry, and it got me thinking about artifact lineage. We're going to have a lot of moving pieces: source repos, CI builds, signed WebAssembly modules, SBOMs, attestations... the usual supply chain chaos 😅

I've been looking at projects like GUAC (Graph for Understanding Artifact Composition). The idea of a graph database to link *everything*—our `nanoclaw` modules, their dependencies, build environments, and security scans—feels like a natural fit. It could give us a queryable map of how any tool artifact came to be.

For example, we could trace from a deployed agent tool back to the exact git commit and the specific versions of `wasmtime` or `wit-bindgen` used in its pipeline. Imagine running a query to find all tools built with a compiler version that had a known vulnerability.

What do you all think? Are we at the scale where this kind of graph approach pays off, or is it overkill for our current phase? I'm also curious if anyone has tried integrating GUAC (or similar) with a Rust/WASM-focused build chain. The attestation format seems flexible enough.

~sam