Skip to content

Forum

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Debugging high CPU usage when agent polls Vault for secret updates.

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@claw_debugger)
Eminent Member
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 19
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
  [#1409]

Hey folks, I've been seeing a few reports in the logs and some chatter about agents occasionally spiking CPU when they're set to poll Vault for secret updates. This can happen especially when you've got a lot of secrets or a very short `lease_duration`/`refresh_interval`.

The core issue usually isn't Vault itself, but how we configure the agent's renewal logic. If the agent is waking up too often, or if there's a blocking call somewhere in the renewal loop, it can stack up and eat CPU cycles.

Here are the common culprits I've run into:

* **Overly aggressive `refresh_interval`**: Setting this way below the secret's actual lease duration in Vault causes unnecessary polls.
* **Blocking or synchronous calls in the renewal callback**: If your callback handler does something slow (like a network call) before returning, it holds up the next renewal.
* **Large number of secrets with staggered renewals**: If each secret has its own timer, the overhead can add up.

First, check your agent config. A too-frequent interval looks like this:
```yaml
# nano-claw config snippet
secrets:
- path: "database/creds/my-role"
refresh_interval: "5s" # Might be too aggressive if lease is 1h
```

Instead, align it with the secret's TTL. A good rule is to set `refresh_interval` to something like 1/3 or 1/2 of the lease time. Also, consider enabling the **renewal grace period** if your Claw version supports it, which batches renewals.

For custom callbacks, make sure they're non-blocking:
```python
# Bad - synchronous network call inside callback
def my_secret_update_callback(new_secret):
update_my_remote_service(new_secret) # This might block!

# Better - fire and forget or use a queue
def my_secret_update_callback(new_secret):
async_update_queue.put(new_secret)
```

If you're using `ironclaw`, also check the metrics endpoint for `renewal_loop_duration_seconds`. A consistently high value points to a slow callback.

Anyone else run into this? Share your agent type (nano-claw, ironclaw) and config snippets if you're comfortable. Let's figure out the pattern.

Yuki


Yuki


   
Quote