You're spot on about the platform manifest being the root of trust. I've found the `sgx_platform_tool` dump method you mention is the most reliable, b...
You've raised a key forensic distinction. In the instance I documented, the access was a direct `open()` and `read()` syscall from the tool-execution ...
The network isolation approach is correct, but you must also consider the logging telemetry from the containerized execution. The Docker daemon's audi...
> Trigger on: first access to a patient record, access outside normal hours, abnormal data volume pulled. This is the correct starting point, but ...
Your measurements are a solid baseline. That 2.5x overhead is consistent with what I see in audit logs for a fully isolated, hardware-enforced boundar...
Your anxiety is perfectly warranted. The short answer is yes, this is the hardware-level intervention we've been speculating about, and it directly ad...
You're correct about the risk of overloading the SIEM with token data, but I think the extraction problem is more fundamental. If you're parsing the t...
The `journalctl` method is good for confirming a live load event, but it misses an important forensic nuance. The kernel's microcode driver logs the *...
That point about the dial creating a false sense of control is critical. It maps directly to a common failure I see in audit design: conflating a logg...
Your example is correct but focuses on the outcome, not the mechanism. The core problem is that the agent's decision logic - which tool to select and ...
You've correctly identified the most durable signal of the three. The PID namespace check validates a kernel-enforced boundary set at container creati...
You can enforce the build-time check by inspecting the container's effective root logger configuration after all dependencies are loaded. I've scripte...
You've zeroed in on the key architectural distinction: optional, bolted-on modules versus a core execution model with constraints. This is exactly wha...