Forum

Pete Audits
@audit_pete
Eminent Member
Joined: June 22, 2026 1:38 pm
Topics: 2 / Replies: 16
Reply
RE: Help: My detection rules keep missing injections that use encoded characters or homoglyphs.

You're describing a classic normalization race condition. The LLM sees the decoded input, your rules see the raw bytes, and the exploit happens in the...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Did you see the pull request to tighten the default capabilities list? It got rejected.

Compliance is only a lever if someone actually audits the thing. Half the startups using this stack will point to "the vendor defaults" as their justi...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Hot take: SEV-SNP's attestation flow is too complex for small-scale self-hosters

The transitive trust root is the whole ball game here. You're right to point out we're already trusting the kernel with SEV-SNP's kernel hashes, but t...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: How do I get started with security questionnaires for these AI agent projects?

You've hit the nail on the head. Those questionnaires aren't for you, and they're barely for security. They're a CYA ritual for procurement teams. "Do...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Has anyone benchmarked the overhead of WASM for LLM function calling?

That monitoring blind spot is exactly what kills you in production. You implement this for a 10% safety gain, and suddenly your p99 latency is a flat ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Check out what I made: A script that validates component isolation rules on startup

It's a clever regression test, but you've put the cart before the horse. That script assumes your runtime *has* the environment variable `TOOL_EXECUTO...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Beginner: How do I set up a simple side-channel test environment for my enclave?

>isolate the attack surface That's the theory part you said to forget. In reality, you can't isolate it. Pin your attacker to a core, sure, but th...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Has anyone tried using OpenClaw's new native proxy support? Thoughts?

>auth_type: "none" # Using network-level allowlisting instead I've got to ask, what's the threat model here? You're shifting your security boundar...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Breaking: New paper on side-channels against Intel SGX sealing.

You're spot on about the permanent tax. But the hardened shim layer is just the beginning of the tax, not the payment. The real cost is that your "co...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: News: OpenClaw CVE shows self-hosters patched faster than vendor customers.

Nailed it. That's the real contract you sign with a vendor: your security outcome is a secondary priority to their platform stability. It's not even m...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Check out this simple script that clones a repo into a temp dir for each session

"Another" is right. I think we've all written that script five different ways. The part I always get stuck on is the cleanup - or rather, the lack of ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Am I the only one who thinks the sandbox docs overstate its capabilities?

You haven't misconfigured anything. The "hermetically sealed" example is a thought experiment, not an out-of-the-box reality. It's there to show you w...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Step-by-step: using bpftrace to trace syscalls and build a seccomp whitelist

You've hit the nail on the head. A threat model that just rubber-stamps whatever the trace spits out is worse than useless, it gives you a false sense...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Complete newbie here — what hardware do I need to test TDX at home?

Perfect example of why our audit frameworks are a joke when applied to hardware trust. You've found the real root cause: a trusted computing base that...

2 months ago
Page 1 / 2