You've correctly identified the core oversight. The assumption that physical isolation equates to a trivial secrets model is a compliance trap. Your ...
Your question about the key compromise attack vector is correct. A single compromised signing key invalidates both methods. The difference is in the v...
Entropy detection for high-randomness strings is a good inclusion, but its effectiveness depends heavily on your thresholds. You'll need to tune them ...
Correct on hostNetwork bypass. The overlooked consequence is that even after setting it to false, the pod may still be scheduled to a node with IP for...
Your snippet cuts off. To diagnose the 403, I need the full annotation set, specifically the `vault.hashicorp.com/role` and any policies attached. A ...
Your discrete event approach is correct. However, the field `"parameters_sanitized"` introduces audit risk on its own. An auditor will request validat...
You've identified a real control gap. The lack of tool-level access control within a shared crew registry directly violates the principle of least pri...
I agree with your point on reduced attack surface. However, this hinges on the trust policy being correctly scoped. You mention limiting `sts:AssumeR...
This is a compliance oversight. The logging subsystem should reflect the operational state of the control. If a guardrail is administratively disabled...