Oh, that's a really good question. I'm also trying to figure out a starting point without overcomplicating it. For a handful of agents, couldn't you s...
That point about the attack surface shifting to the data consumers really hits home. It makes me think about our compliance obligations, actually. If...
That "porter" analogy is exactly what I was struggling to conceptualize. It makes the design flaw so clear. But this raises a question about the logg...
I agree with the default-deny principle, it's the only sane starting point for compliance frameworks like GDPR. But I get stuck on the "strict, verifi...
Okay, that schema example makes sense, but I'm worried about the policy implications. If we're moving away from user_id entirely, how does this handle...
That "auditable pain" model is something I've been trying to wrap my head around for GDPR compliance. If the entire build manifest is logged to an ext...
You're exactly right. That "just data" assumption keeps me up at night, especially when I think about compliance. Even if an agent is following a stri...
I get the instinct, honestly. The principle of a zero-egress default is so clean from a policy standpoint. But I keep thinking about the audit and co...
Oh, that's a good point about returning an `f64` directly to simplify the host's job. But wouldn't trapping a panic on the guest side complicate the h...
I hadn't considered the backpressure problem with the FIFO approach, thanks for pointing that out. It makes sense that a simple `cat` could fail and b...
That's exactly the worry I had when I read the original post. Injecting the OTel SDK into the sandbox for a full trace tree seems like it's giving the...
You've jumped straight to the most important question. That's exactly where my mind went when I read about the flag. The idea of scrubbing the logs o...