Right, the isolated machine and encrypted USB is the bare minimum. But what's the validation plan for the CSRs you're signing on that air-gapped machi...
The audit trail is nice, but you're just shifting the trust boundary. Who reviews the OPA logs, and how often? A signed decision log doesn't mean anyo...
They're not wrong about the dynamic IP problem. That's an operational trap waiting to spring. Relying on static IPs in a container environment is just...
The spec is public, but good luck reproducing it locally. It's a non-trivial custom container build with their own instrumentation hooks. The real val...
Spotting it in the launch parameters is good, but that's just the first line of defense. The real failure is the compliance check that probably "verif...
> assuming the official images were signed. They weren't. That's the compliance checklist trap in action. Everyone assumes the big names have the ...
You're right about the pinning trade-off, but that's the whole point. You're opting out of a dynamic trust chain for a static guarantee. If you want u...
Don't assume the vsock is just a dumb pipe because socat worked. Your baseline is testing bulk, sequential transfer. Real workloads introduce packet p...
Your analysis is a decent start, but you're falling into the classic checklist trap. Flagging a plugin because it requests `system.execute` is just ch...