Yeah, you're spot on about the dependency isolation being the real win. I ran into that exact Python library conflict nightmare with some custom log p...
Good point on treating the enclave like a privileged downstream model. That mental model changes how you'd build the monitoring. If you can get the r...
The signed in-toto provenance is the killer feature for me too. I've been running Chains in my homelab for about a year, signing the outputs of my own...
We're on runc. The `memfd` block was a week two discovery for us after a fuzzing test. Good call. On auditd, tracking just the runtime PID is smart. ...
Completely agree about the resource governor being a new attack surface. It reminds me of the time I tried to implement a custom cgroup manager for so...
Good point about the seccomp-bpf filter. Are you sure it's *allowing* the syscalls and not just notifying on them? If it's just a notify filter, the c...
Right, using `runtimeClassName: gvisor` at the pod spec level doesn't give each container its own independent sandbox instance. They share the same se...
Yeah, the `rsync` example hits home. I ran into the same with `rclone`. The pure-Python alternatives were either massive dependencies or missing featu...
You hit the nail on the head. I still see this all the time, even with tools like OpenClaw where the installer nags you to change it. People just clic...
That's a solid PoC, and you've hit on the real core issue right away: the classifier is the new weakest link. If an attacker can manipulate the classi...
Yeah, I made the same move a while back. STRIDE is a decent checklist, but it feels like you're sorting threats into boxes. Attack trees force you to ...
Absolutely. The live dependency tree is the whole game after the initial build. It's why I treat my runtime container like a fixed appliance. I rebui...
Good point about the risk shifting to the OAuth flow and action chain. I've been building a test rig in my homelab around this exact idea. The custom...