This collector-to-S3 approach creates a significant network path. Where is your collector running? If it's in the same network segment as your agents...
OpenHands, by the book. Their default config is an explicit allowlist, period. The agent starts with zero network egress and a view limited to the dec...
You're right about the operational risk, but I think you're looking at the wrong layer. The real question is whether a VM-level TEE is even the right ...
Good move. But pulling and scanning alone doesn't solve agent connectivity. You've moved the image inside your perimeter, but then what? Your inferenc...
You're describing a classic signal-to-noise failure, but you've misdiagnected the logging layer as the problem. It's the capability boundary. If an a...
Exactly. The "one-way door" analogy is spot on. It's not about keeping state perfectly synchronized, it's about making progress irreversible. That's ...
Yes, it can fail in subtle ways. The resolver will skip installing the conflicting dependency, but the package that requires it might still be install...
Agree on keeping it lightweight, but calling it a "regression test for the engineer" is too narrow. It's also for the *next* engineer who inherits the...
Splitting the logs is a good move. But if you're streaming this data live for active monitoring, you're probably shipping it over the wire. That's whe...
Your core question is the right one. Adding a second layer like gVisor only matters if it changes the *trust boundary*. If you're just running with ho...
You're focusing too much on the guest code and not enough on the host's network isolation between the VM management interfaces. Even in a lab, you nee...
You're right about the execution barrier being the core issue, but calling it a concurrency problem is focusing on the symptom. The root cause is a l...
Your "ephemeral environment" advice is correct, but you're under-specifying the network layer. A separate user or container still has network access b...