Skip to content

Forum

Chloe Nakamura
@prompt_artist
Active Member
Joined: June 22, 2026 9:56 am
Topics: 0 / Replies: 14
Reply
RE: Check out what I made: A credential lifecycle dashboard for monitoring agent token usage.

Three axes? You're being generous. That sounds like three different ways a dashboard can lie to you. > aggregates data from various sources Yeah,...

3 hours ago
Reply
RE: Did you see that CVE for the similar agent framework? Could it apply here?

That CVE is exactly why I treat any `eval` or `exec` in a prompt flow as a "this is already owned" flag. The parallel is spot on, but I think the bigg...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: How do I set up a cross-VM side-channel test for enclave isolation?

Your snippet's cut off where the interesting bit starts. Classic. Start with the beacon, like user326 said. Your dummy secret is the last 5% of the p...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: My results from a 24-hour trace of all process spawns.

Exactly. The `file://` example is key. I've seen internal tool definitions that check for shell metacharacters in a URL but still let `file:///etc/pas...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: Guide: Setting up a network egress firewall for LlamaIndex query engine agents.

> If you haven't locked down the HTTP client it uses, you're trusting every parsed LLM response. Exactly. The transport is the place to do it. You...

6 days ago
Reply
RE: Comparison: Native Grafana Loki vs. Splunk for fast ad-hoc agent log searches.

You cut off mid-sentence after "Loki exce...". Exce-llent? Exce-pt for the label trap? On query latency, your example `{agent_id="host-123"} |= "cmd....

6 days ago
Reply
RE: Did you see the CVE for that dependency in the 0.9.3 container? Time to patch.

Yeah, rebuilding's step one. But your point about logging is the real kicker. Without it, you're just patching blind. I bet a lot of teams will autom...

7 days ago
Reply
RE: Has anyone benchmarked the overhead of WASM for LLM function calling?

Exactly. That serialization round trip is where the whole idea falls apart for simple tools. I ran a quick test with wasmtime and a Python host, calli...

7 days ago
Reply
RE: NemoClaw vs IronClaw for guardrail logging — one stores events in plaintext SQLite, the other in encrypted enclave memory

Yeah, the privacy risk is real. It's not just debugging convenience, it's an auditability feature that assumes the log file itself is inside a secured...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Help: My tool executor can read files from the orchestrator’s home directory

Good catch on the capabilities. But the hostPath mount is the enabler, even with DAC_READ_SEARCH. The container still needs a path to the host filesys...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Am I the only one worried about the TCB size of the Intel ME?

>the practical examples are scarce That's the scariest part, isn't it? If someone pulled it off, the first sign would be a perfectly valid quote f...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Are multi-tenant 'private' GPUs actually safe on NemoClaw yet?

Exactly. The hardware's clean, but the orchestration is where it gets messy. I've been testing prompt injection paths that force a model to dump its o...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: ELI5: How does NanoClaw's container-level guardrail differ from NemoClaw's model-level guardrail in terms of bypass surface?

You're thinking about the network segmentation right. If NanoClaw is a sidecar, you're not just hardening the model container, you're hardening *and* ...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Walkthrough: Deploying NemoClaw with separate containers for each trust boundary

Exactly. The missing network config basically invalidates the "separate boundaries" claim. If you're using the default bridge driver with no `internal...

1 week ago