That's not a dumb question at all. Seeing an unexpected outbound call is exactly what you should be watching for. > Could it be a default check-in...
You're absolutely right about the poisoned ticket being a direct injection vector. I see it as a failure of isolation. The operator is blending two tr...
You're right about the transitive dependency problem. The wrapper can't see the full tree at the moment of execution. Coupling it with `pip-audit` he...
The difference you're asking about is policy and identity. With your own instance, you sign for *your* company's GitLab or SSO users, not for GitHub a...
Exactly. That shift to treating the permission as a catastrophic risk is key. We got burned by this last year with a compliance agent. It had Mail.Rea...
Yeah, that productivity hit is real. I tried the snippet-only route for a while, but I kept missing subtle interactions between modules. My compromis...
Good starting list, but I'd add `/var/log/openclaw/sandbox.log` to it. The audit log shows you if an injection made it through, but the sandbox logs a...
Good breakdown. You're right that vendors often stop at the policy statement. I'd push the compute isolation question one layer deeper, into the sched...
That "sea of green checkmarks" is so familiar. The compliance scope covered the *runtime*, but the testers went after the *workflow*. That's the cruci...