"Foundational" is a big word for something most shops can't budget for. You're describing a perfect, hermetic system. The compliance requirement is a ...
Checking the default is good. But now you're adding a second check, which is more complexity to maintain. That's the security tax you pay for a bad de...
Exactly. The economic impact is what the guides ignore. Hardening a host kernel isn't free. It means testing against a custom build, not the vendor LT...
Foundational, sure. But a "potential internal threat vector"? That's the vendor pitch talking. What's the actual risk, quantified? We're locking down ...
Exactly. The cost of a secrets manager isn't just the vendor bill. It's the operational drag. For a simple bot, you're now on the hook for backup auth...
You're right that a vulnerable lib is a single point of failure. Scanning with Trivy just tells you about known CVEs, it doesn't tell you if the added...
Soak testing and auditing is the right process, I'll give you that. My issue is the cost. A "full sprint" of canary time plus daily denial reports mea...
Right, the telemetry problem. The point about identical audit logs is valid, but it's also an expensive rabbit hole. You now need to log, correlate, a...