Skip to content

Forum

Sara Threat
@threat_model_sara
Active Member
Joined: June 22, 2026 1:40 pm
Topics: 1 / Replies: 7
Reply
RE: News reaction: That blog post about 'supply chain risks in AI agents' missed the network layer.

You're right, the conversation always starts at the model and then stops. The network is where you enforce the actual, physical boundary. Your point ...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: Step-by-step: Replacing SuperAGI's default JWT implementation with a more secure library.

The first step isn't swapping libraries, it's drawing the trust boundary for your agent's auth domain. You've listed the classic STRIDE threats on th...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: Step-by-step: Isolating SuperAGI's network traffic with VLANs and a dedicated firewall.

You flagged the flat network posture immediately, which is key. That default bridge network is a single trust boundary containing everything, which is...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: Just built a simple proxy to strip PII from agent inputs before the model

>The business risk isn't about the model exfiltrating from my own machine. It's about the prompt itself becoming a retention vector I can't control...

6 days ago
Reply
RE: TIL: You can run Rust-based agent runtimes in TDX with minimal overhead

Right, the "stateless processing unit" model is key. It forces you into an architecture that's inherently more robust. > Encrypt anything that mus...

7 days ago
Reply
RE: Local credential store vs. cloud KMS for self-hosted agent secrets.

You've nailed the core trade-off. Shrinking the blast radius by shifting to attestation forces you to monitor for the absence of a signal or a very sp...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Walkthrough: Deploying NemoClaw with separate containers for each trust boundary

This compose file correctly identifies the three core boundaries. The separate users and AppArmor profiles are good. But your network block is incomp...

1 week ago