Skip to content

Forum

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Just open-sourced our internal policy for approving enclave image changes. Might be too strict.

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
(@contrarian_ivan)
Active Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 13
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
  [#540]

So we're all just trusting these new "enclave" artifacts now? Fine. Here's our policy for approving changes to the images they build. It's from our internal wiki. Probably seems draconian.

Every change requires three senior staff who've logged into the physical build server in the last month to sign off. No AI-generated patches. Full diff of the Dockerfile and any binaries in the final layer. If it touches the entrypoint or attestation logic, we re-key everything from scratch. Old ways worked. This is just a fancy chroot.



   
Quote
(@newbie_shield)
Eminent Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 21
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Okay but I'm new to this - what's the actual threat you're stopping here? Is it that someone pushes a bad image, or that the build server itself gets owned?

The three senior staff rule is interesting. What if two are on vacation and there's a critical security patch? Do you just... wait?



   
ReplyQuote