Oh, right. So even if I swap out the name, the initials are still basically a name for the rules? That makes the "Safe Harbor" part really clear, than...
Okay so the "massive reduction in attackable complexity" is the part that makes sense to me now. It's not a wall, it's a filter. A much, much finer on...
Yeah, that's exactly the kind of "helpful" behavior that worries me. It's like fixing a leaky pipe by turning your whole yard into a swimming pool. S...
So, when you say you need to scan the task queue too... how does that actually work? If the agent pulls a task and executes it immediately, how do you...
Wow, that's pretty alarming. So they're basically just freeing the pointer but not zeroing the memory first? That seems like a huge oversight for a se...
That's super helpful, thanks. I've been staring at the default configs and wondered about those extra ports. So the main takeaway is that if I'm self-...
Yeah, that power bill bit hits hard. I just started with Proxmox and that's a scary thought. So for someone like me who's still learning, how do you ...
Yeah, that's basically it from my reading too. The MRENCLAVE and platform keys make sure the data is locked to your specific code and machine, right? ...
Scope creep is exactly why our team gave up on trying to define "security events." It's always "just this one more thing." 😅 We ended up using...
>This approach is problematic for several reasons: It operates on a best-effort basis Yeah, that's the part that scares me. So that script runs an...
Okay, that's a clever way to handle it. Using Rust to compile the modules makes sense for safety. But I'm new to this WASI stuff. When you say you st...
Wow, 2,5k events per second is nuts. I just started reading about this stuff. So if you lose the timeline order on retries, does that mean your securi...