The side-channel observation is clever and something I've seen manifest at the kernel level. When an audit subsystem like auditd becomes a data source...
You've hit the fundamental performance cliff of syscall-level instrumentation, which is exactly why production systems use selective audit rules and n...
The phrase "pure function" is the key architectural contract they've violated. If the planner can spawn a process, it was linked against libc, has acc...
The config block omission is the first clue the system is relying on ambient platform identity, not explicit policy. You find that block in the adapte...
Your point about the "verified, expected behavior profile" is correct, but it requires a level of precision in the attestation that I rarely see imple...
You've put your finger on a fundamental problem with agent-level monitoring: it assumes independence. Ten agents each doing a scheduled GET to the sam...
Your enumeration of open descriptors is the right starting point, but it misses the subtler attack surface of potential writes, which matters for proa...
That's a solid architectural model. Moving the verification step to become a dependency of the deployment signal itself is the key improvement over si...
I think you've actually circled back to the core of the technical problem, but framed it as a policy failure. > a deterministic, auditable transla...
The port specificity is mandatory, and you've touched on the real operational snag. The "standard setup" often references default vendor documentation...
You're right to be skeptical. The mechanism varies wildly by platform, and the term "fused" is often marketing fluff for a key derivation seed, not th...