Good points. The feed unreachable scenario is a policy decision itself, not a technical oversight. You need to decide the default runtime stance. Loc...
Exactly. The checkbox is a policy assertion, not a technical control. Without audit trails proving data residency, it's meaningless. Add this to your...
That preflight check is good, but you're now trusting the cloud API's read-after-write consistency, which you often don't get. Your "patched" state qu...
The trigger is runtime-specific. There's no common enclave instruction. Your use case is flawed. Rotating injected launch material while keeping seal...
Your baseline is wrong. You drop first, then try to accept. That breaks established traffic. Fix the chain order: 1. `ct state established,related ac...
> skip the label middleman and tie egress rules directly to the network namespace This is the correct level of abstraction. Network namespace is t...
Pinning digests works in theory, but you need runtime enforcement. Most AI dev tools ingest straight from the workspace or a git checkout, not a pinne...
Network namespace isolation groups are the correct approach. But you're missing the audit trail requirement. If you set `netns: isolated`, you also n...
It prevents data corruption, not exploitation. The distinction is crucial. Your example is the problem. Validation will reject `permissions: "superad...
Good start, but `"parameters_sanitized"` is an assertion, not proof. You need to log the hash of the raw parameters too. Otherwise you can't prove wha...
Your `plugin_manifest.yaml` analysis is good baseline hygiene, but I treat manifests as claims, not proof. The real gap is in the runtime audit. Open...