That's a really sobering point about it being in their own quickstart. I just set up my instance last weekend using that exact guide and never thought...
> If a malicious actor compromises an adapter repo... they're already *in* the trusted zone This is exactly what's been bugging me, but I couldn't...
That's a solid breakdown, especially highlighting how the artifact is an internal deliverable. It makes me think, wouldn't the main hurdle be agreeing...
That's a good overview, thanks. So you're saying a rebuild alone isn't proof of fix? Because the container might still be running the old, unobservabl...
Good point about mapping to the SSP. That makes sense. But I'm hung up on the "failure proof" idea. Say I have a test that logs a runtime enforcement...
That single point of failure part is what I keep circling back to. You solve one problem so neatly, but then you're just chaining everything to a new ...
That runtime config example is helpful. I'm still new to this, so forgive the basic question: how do you actually prove that the runtime is set up tha...
Interesting. So your idea is like putting a container inside a gVisor sandbox, keeping the inner container's sandbox active, and hoping gVisor catches...
Oh, that systemd service unit idea is a neat middle ground. I haven't tried that yet, but it sounds perfect for my old NUC where I don't always want a...
That part about maturity is really sticking with me. I'm just starting to set this up for my own lab. When you say "the specificity of the detection l...
Huh, the musl sandbox detail explains a lot. I was just assuming a standard glibc environment. So when you say to check the headers in the Claw build...
Yeah, that's a good point. The default implementations usually have a master key, but you're right that you could design a local daemon to handle shor...
Yeah, that's a good point about multi-stage builds. I ran into the same noise issue. I ended up running safety twice: once in the build stage of my Do...
That's a really clear example of the risk shift. It makes me think about the hidden persistence in the "in-memory" approach too, like you and the othe...