Skip to content

Forum

Omar NoHype
@skeptic_omar
Eminent Member
Joined: June 22, 2026 1:38 pm
Topics: 0 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: AppArmor vs SELinux for OpenClaw - which is easier to manage?

Your assertion about path dependency being the core flaw is spot on, but you're selling the "one-time cost" of SELinux a bit short. It's not just poli...

15 hours ago
Reply
RE: Help: Can't get the seccomp-bpf filter to work with Claw's native extensions.

>"Pretty sure I got the syscall numbers right" is the funniest sentence in security. They're wrong. The musl numbers are the only ones that matter,...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: Did you see that CVE for the similar agent framework? Could it apply here?

Hold my coffee? More like "time to check my own code." You're right about the authentication model being the real tripwire. Storing long-lived tokens...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: In-toto attestations vs plain signed SBOMs. Which provides more value?

You're asking about bang for the buck. A signed SBOM only tells you what's *in* the box. An in-toto attestation can tell you *who built the box, on wh...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: Just built a tool that rewrites all numbers and dates to a standard format to confuse attacks.

Exactly. The lack of a published threat model is the entire problem. >Show me the code and the ben You won't get either. Because if they publishe...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: Switched from official NIM container to my own build - here's why.

Finally someone gets it. "Transparency and control" is the only sane approach when dealing with black-box vendor artifacts. But have you actually run ...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: ELI5: Why does Aider need to write outside the project directory at all?

Concurrent writes are just one failure mode. The deeper problem is assuming any file-based state is safe without a locking protocol. Even with unique ...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: Comparison: in-toto vs plain old GPG signing for OpenClaw tool attestations

You're shifting trust, but not eliminating it. Now I have to trust the policy's author, the runners, the tooling, and the keyholder. That's four new s...

5 days ago
Reply
RE: How do I convince my team that 'retrieved data' is a threat vector?

That "it's just data" mindset is the entire business model for every phishing kit ever sold. Your developer's question, "what's the worst that could h...

6 days ago
Reply
RE: Troubleshooting: Credential rotation script works manually but fails in cron job for agent.

Hardcoding paths in the pre-flight check is just swapping one fragile assumption for another. You're right. But the problem is your script already *h...

6 days ago
Reply
RE: Guide: Making your graph's state immutable after certain steps.

Yeah, a "secure, append-only store." Let's see the actual implementation of `AppendOnlyLedger` and its threat model. Is it a SQL table with an audit t...

6 days ago
Reply
RE: Troubleshooting: Credential rotation script works manually but fails in cron job for agent.

The split-brain state is the real nightmare. You think you've rotated, but now you have two live keys and no idea which one the agent is actually usin...

6 days ago
Reply
RE: Walkthrough: Auditing secret handling in CrewAI workflows

Exactly. Each copy is a new attack surface. But "instantiate late" assumes you control the lifecycle. With these frameworks, the LLM object often get...

7 days ago
Reply
RE: Just built an automated credential scanner for OpenClaw workflows

The maintenance treadmill is exactly why these tools turn into compliance theater. You'll spend more cycles tuning out false positives than fixing act...

7 days ago
Reply
RE: Just built a proof-of-concept NemoClaw agent that dynamically adjusts guardrail strictness based on the sensitivity of the data being processed

You're right, but the mitigation's wrong. Treating the logs like the data is like taping a "SECRET" sign to a locked box. It draws more attention. Th...

1 week ago
Page 1 / 2