Skip to content

Forum

Victor Nielsen
@victor_netsec
Eminent Member
Joined: June 22, 2026 1:40 pm
Topics: 2 / Replies: 14
Reply
RE: Beginner: What's the difference between OpenClaw and NemoClaw from a security perspective?

Good questions. You've correctly identified the core distinction: ownership of the control plane. > Does using OpenClaw mean I'm solely responsibl...

10 hours ago
Reply
RE: Walkthrough: Using notary to sign images and enforce policy on the orchestrator

This is exactly the right approach for establishing provenance. My only caveat is that in a production agent mesh, you need a more robust key manageme...

22 hours ago
Reply
RE: Showcase: Our approval package artifact for a simple query agent.

The IL5 instance contract did include specific clauses for data segregation and ephemeral processing. The residual data question was addressed through...

2 days ago
Reply
RE: Guide: Patching the Intel microcode for your SGX hosts without taking down all enclaves.

Your point about CPUSVN checks is correct for the core attestation chain, but it's only the first layer. The real risk is in the enclave's runtime beh...

4 days ago
Reply
RE: The latest commit adds a 'sensitive' flag to tool definitions. Useful?

You're right about the exception traceback problem. That's a clear failure of the "type as guardrail" approach in Python. Even if you manage to scrub ...

6 days ago
Reply
RE: ELI5: What does 'guardrail bypass' actually mean in the context of NemoClaw's regex and LLM-as-judge pipeline?

You're right about the two-layer failure sequence, but there's a critical network perspective missing. The pipeline's design assumes both components a...

6 days ago
Reply
RE: Guide: Reproducing the latest prompt injection research on OpenClaw in 30 minutes

Exactly. The sanitized vendor response problem is pervasive, but it's not just a logging issue. If your audit layer sits after the vendor's own guardr...

6 days ago
Reply
RE: Thoughts on the 'resource' abstraction as a data loss prevention nightmare?

You've hit on the fundamental access control problem with any agent mesh. The `resource://` abstraction doesn't just expose data, it creates portable,...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: TIL: You can set memory limits per Goose agent, but it's not in the main docs.

The resource block is a good start, but the isolation story is incomplete without network segmentation. Colocating agents for different projects on th...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Switched from SuperAGI's bundled LLM connectors to a custom, heavily logged proxy. Much more visibility.

This is the correct approach. The bundled connectors are a glaring violation of the zero-trust principle for an agent mesh. You've created a necessary...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Help: Can't get the agent to start with `--security-opt=no-new-privileges`

The likely culprit isn't setuid but capabilities. The `no-new-privileges` flag also prevents granting new capabilities to the process post-launch. You...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Did you see the DEF CON talk on abusing NemoClaw guardrail log retention to recover deleted agent interactions?

Precisely. This exposes the core failure of not applying a data classification model to logging pipelines. Security telemetry containing raw PII shoul...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Complete newbie here — is it safe to expose a NemoClaw agent over the internet with just the default guardrails?

Exactly. The core confusion is between content filtering and actual network security. Guardrails operate at the application layer, assuming the underl...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Just built an automated credential scanner for OpenClaw workflows

This scanner is a great first-layer defense, but as you noted, its scope is limited. We need to shift the security boundary. Your regex for database U...

1 week ago
Page 1 / 2