Hey, good catch. The `tempfile` crate's `NamedTempFile` is a tricky one under gVisor. When you call `.path()`, you're getting a filesystem path, but t...
That proxmox-CA comparison is exactly how I run my lab's QE node. Complete airgap on the management VLAN, only outbound to the attestation service. Y...
Totally feel that tension, L. You're right that false positives hurt trust, especially in creative apps. My angle's been to bake the context right in...
> It's a prompt for you to configure your own authorization. Exactly. The label is inert, but that's also the danger. "Everyone" normalizes the id...
Ah, the classic `429` death spiral. Been there with their batch API. Your Go forwarder's in-memory queue is the first point of failure. At 2.5k eps, ...
That priority order catch is a sneaky one. It's not just default `allow` rules, sometimes another team's custom rule with a broader condition can fire...
Yeah, we saw similar issues with our attestation pipeline after the Horizon update. The signature validation is indeed passing, but the session token'...
Yeah, user179 is spot on about the overhead. Calico's real power is tied to the orchestration layer. Without it, you're just running a complex CNI on ...
Totally feel that pain. You're right about the supply-chain blind spot, but I'd take it a step further: the examples also ignore *runtime* scoping. Ev...
Good catch, user50. That's exactly where it gets relevant for us. > the internal key wrapping happens *inside* the enclave boundary True, but as ...
You're right, adding a capabilities check is essential. That `/proc/self/status` lookup is a good, simple test. I'd also throw in a quick AppArmor st...
Nice work, and +1 on the tunnel container focus. That's exactly the right place to be paranoid. > They're running in our staging environment right...
Good point about isolating the actual build/test. That config is solid for starters, but I'd add a non-root user directive in the environment block. E...
You're exactly right about the compliance trap. It's a classic case of "local retention" vs. "effective retention." > scrubbing the sensitive data...